Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Why can't we let the people work it out?

Well, I guess my loyal readers deserve another update from me. It's late and I can't sleep, so you're now getting one, much to the dismay of my wakefulness come tomorrow morning.
I've started reading Huck Finn. A few weeks ago, I realized I'd never really read a classic American novel (from that century at least), so it was time. Got a copy at the used bookstore near where we live. I must say, that's one of the most perfect novels I've ever read. It never drags, it has a great story, deep characters, and I've never encountered better humor (in fiction) than Twain. For one of our classes, we have a final paper where we choose any topic that we can relate to Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America, and I've decided to do mine as a comparison between Huck Finn and Democracy in America: showing how what Tocqueville sees with regards to race, individualism, literature, morality, family, and religion is also observed by Twain through Huck Finn. Or something like that.
Work is okay. It's kind of fun working there, but I think it may be only because I have the assurance that I won't be working at AAAS past a certain date. It has been a good experience, and I've seen a lot of the stuff I wanted to when coming here, but this internship has also shown me that I really don't want an office job for some fifty-odd years of my life--but I think I already knew that.
I write as much as I can in my free time. I need to really "sharpen my craft," as I call it, and hopefully get some more things published, so I can at least have some kind of portfolio to show for myself whenever I hit the career market. Whenever that will be.
This writing here doesn't count. This writing here sucks. This is single draft 3 AM writing.
I want to learn Chinese. Once I've done this, I'll go to China, and start a travel blog there. I will have 5 entries for 10 months.
My economics professor here is the best teacher I've ever had in my life. Seriously. Thomas Rustici, econ professor at George Mason. Before coming here, I had never really formed any strong thoughts about economics, but now I'm becoming a semi-psychotic libertarian. And I like it. Not libertarian like Philip Brooks (that term probably is too socialistic for him, he once defined himself on his facebook as "anarcho-capitalist"), but very disenchanted with the way the government handles economic policy. I'll amend that, it's too weak: I'm extremely baffled and upset and frustrated by politicians' eternal habit of putting needless regulations and taxes on the market, saying that they're helping the people, and oftentimes just needlessly killing a few unlucky citizens and making everyone else's life much, much worse. Professor Rustici has quite a few personal stories that relate the subject to him very ... personally.
In the lecture on minimum wage (hands down the best class lecture I've ever sat in), he told us through tears about his grandfather who immigrated here from Sicily, and while providing the money for a middle-class existence in the '30s, lost his eyesight. He lost his job, and in a few months, the family had spent all their savings, sold all their furniture, taken their older son (my professor's father) out of fifth grade to work 16 hour days in a bakery, and were still so hungry they at one point had to ask their neighbor for the weeds they picked out of their garden to eat. Eventually their catholic church set up a collection for them, and congregation members provided the parents with enough low-paying work to pay for putting meat on the table one night per week (the son never returned to school). But these jobs they were working paid below minimum wage, and when the federal government found out about it, they harassed the family and threatened to put them in jail for making less than minimum wage. They finally had to go do the work secretly in the basement of the church, and were able to make it through the rough years.
Well the class actually applauded when he finished that lecture, and it's certainly been the most powerful one, but he always has the best personal anecdotes and historical examples to back up his points. I'm serious: if everyone in this blamed country even just heard one lecture of this, so many terrible politicians and government economists would lose their jobs that, why, we'd have money! Imagine that. I think I may try to put this class into book form one day. Seriously.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I glad to see that you finally updated. That professor sounds amazing. While you enjoy the teachings of the greatest teacher you have heard; I suffer with the lack of skill that is grad students and UGA. Hard times!

triple A said...

Rustici, I can say, is also one the best professor I've had. Not really the best but almost there.

PS I can't believe how much time you have to write such long entries. I seriously struggle in doing that.

PS2 I couldn't help commenting. So yeah, now you know I really read it. Hahaha

Anonymous said...

two posts at once...this is exciting!
Its great that you have a good economics professor. The only thing I remember from my high school econ class is supply and demand. And thats not even worth remembering! I wanna read the other stuff you're writing...whenever you're back I guess.

Anonymous said...

taxes don't kill people --- multibillion dollar wars on terror, deficient education, poverty, lack of access to quality healthcare, a refusal to continue stem cell research (to improve the quality of that healthcare), and a ridiculous minimum wage do. needless regulations and opaque bureaucratic procedure obscure the process and make it impossible for the people who most need to benefit from governmental programs to take advantage of them. to receive indigent medical care at an indigent clinic, one has to take off work (losing desperately-needed money) to trek down to whatever downtown governmental office (and how do you get there when you don't have enough money to have a working car?), and fill out an inordinate amount of complicated paperwork that has to be re-evaluated and confirmed every few months (failure to do so kicks you out of the system and forces you to take another two days off of work to reapply).

people don't need to hear any lectures or personal anecdotes, though they certainly hammer the point home: they need to simply ask why the administration running this country makes more money than its constituents could ever spend while thousands of people lose their lives daily for their government's lack of humanity and overarching incompetence.

tangentially, libertarianism may sound attractive [and though this is only circumstantial, it certainly does mean something], but the only libertarians i've ever met were from middle to upper middle class families who don't know what it's like to have to count pennies to try to find enough money to eat on.

i guess all this it to say: i'm very glad you're enjoying your study of government and politics, because we need intelligent and honest people like you working for the betterment of this nation. but what we need from political leaders isn't a realignment with some better-suited ideology, libertarianism or not; it's depoliticization, a reaffiliation with real people and the real problems they suffer, a resuscitation of a desire to ask the threatening and challenging questions and work tirelessly through incredibly complex issues.

btw, senator kennedy came to speak here last friday --- you might be interested in watching the broadcast, which you can find at http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/kennedy-speech.html (link in the upper right).

hope you had fun in new york,
matt